Navigation

    Kopano
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Get Official Kopano Support
    • Recent
    Statement regarding the closure of the Kopano community forum and the end of the community edition

    E-mail sender information

    Kopano WebApp
    5
    17
    1748
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Jo-TL
      Jo-TL last edited by

      push, what’s going on with this security fix?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • fbartels
        fbartels Kopano last edited by

        Hi @Jo-TL ,

        the issue was resolved through the patch with the upstream library. If you are using our packages you have meanwhile received an updated libvmime-kopano1 package. If you are using other packages you have to bug the maintainer of your libvmime package.

        Regards Felix

        Resources:
        https://kopano.com/blog/how-to-get-kopano/
        https://documentation.kopano.io/
        https://kb.kopano.io/

        Support overview:
        https://kopano.com/support/

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • Jo-TL
          Jo-TL last edited by

          An upgrade didn’t solve the issue for me.

          WebApp: 3.4.24.1929+84.1
          Kopano Core: 8.6.8
          libvmime-kopano1/stable,now 0.9.2.50+11.1 amd64 [installiert]

          It seams to be parsed not correctly for webapp

          Example

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • fbartels
            fbartels Kopano last edited by

            Hi @Jo-TL ,

            when you last posted in this thread I have verified the behaviour with the example posted in https://jira.kopano.io/browse/KC-1044. For me it did show up correctly in WebApp (although I cannot say with certainty which webapp version I used during the test).

            Can you provide a test message that still shows the old behaviour?

            Regards Felix

            Resources:
            https://kopano.com/blog/how-to-get-kopano/
            https://documentation.kopano.io/
            https://kb.kopano.io/

            Support overview:
            https://kopano.com/support/

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • Jo-TL
              Jo-TL last edited by Jo-TL

              ok, then a part of the problem is already fixed, but there are also spoofing mails like the following.

              the best solution would be to match the end of the string

              Return-Path: <m.alberts@kopano.com>
              Received: from malberts-kopano.zarafa.lan ([::ffff:127.0.0.1]:48640)
              	by malberts-kopano (kopano-dagent) with LMTP;
              	Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:30:41 +0100 (CET)
              Received: from malberts-kopano (localhost [127.0.0.1])
              	by malberts-kopano.zarafa.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75950940008
              	for <m.alberts@kopano.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:30:41 +0100 (CET)
              Received: by malberts-kopano (kopano-spooler) with MAPI; Tue, 13 Feb 2018
               09:30:41 +0100
              Subject: martijn eml
              From: Your Boss <yourboss@kopano.de> <secretlysomeoneelse@kopano.net>
              To: =?utf-8?Q?martijn_Test?= <m.alberts@kopano.com>
              Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 09:30:41 +0100
              Mime-Version: 1.0
              Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
              Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
              X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
              X-Mailer: Kopano 8.5.80
              Message-Id: <kcim.5a82a231.1b9c.741b3c847dcfcaaf@malberts-kopano>
              
              <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://ww=
              w.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"><html>
              <head>
                <meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Kopano WebApp vdevel">
                <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8=
              ">
                <title>martijn eml</title>
              </head>
              <body>
              <p style=3D"padding: 0; margin: 0;"><span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-=
              family: tahoma, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><br /></span></p>
              </body>
              </html>
              
              
              fbartels 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • fbartels
                fbartels Kopano @Jo-TL last edited by

                Hi @Jo-TL ,

                thanks for the example. So the difference in these two cases is:

                $ diff martijn.eml email-spoof.eml
                11c11
                < From: yourboss@kopano.de <secretlysomeoneelse@kopano.net>
                ---
                > From: Your Boss <yourboss@kopano.de> <secretlysomeoneelse@kopano.net>
                34d33
                <
                

                I have created https://jira.kopano.io/browse/KC-1350 with some additional details for followup.

                Regards Felix

                Resources:
                https://kopano.com/blog/how-to-get-kopano/
                https://documentation.kopano.io/
                https://kb.kopano.io/

                Support overview:
                https://kopano.com/support/

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • thctlo
                  thctlo last edited by thctlo

                  That message is clearly a spam message.
                  If you look you see : From "Some name " <some@email.tld> <someotherspammer@email.tld>

                  Add this to you spamassassin config.

                  header MULTI_FROM_ADDRESS From =~ /^.*<.*@.*>.*<.*@.*>/i
                  score MULTI_FROM_ADDRESS 5.0
                  describe MULTI_FROM_ADDRESS Multiple senders in From: header
                  
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • djtremors
                    djtremors last edited by

                    welcome to RFC2822 headers is non verifiable and even good mail servers exploit the idiocy of these headers ie “From: YourPersonalServices” and is meant to be a proper service. The header From can have anything it wants and it’s up to your mail system (not really kopano) to block this if it looks wrong.

                    My exim verifies many conditions before it even hits rspamd rules and I kick quite a lot of spam/invalid/faked emails.
                    exim can pull out the header from domain in the email address, if empty, it’s invalid… good or bad…

                    I’ve moved away from postfix due to the cumbersome ways to put filters and I used it for many years too.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • Jo-TL
                      Jo-TL last edited by

                      Sure it’s a spam massage.

                      But kopano/vmime gives a “wrong result” parsing the from field, so obfuscated sender in spoofing mails stay hidden.
                      .
                      Everybody can block mails like this, but a correct result in the frontend makes the world better ;)

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • Jo-TL
                        Jo-TL last edited by

                        In addition of the vmime pull request/open ticket from november:

                        In my opinion it should match the following from types:
                        sender@domain.com
                        Named Sender sender@domain.com
                        Named Sender fakedSender@domain.com sender@domain.com

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • First post
                          Last post